I agree with you about 6.2 appearing quite stable. I guess it's the
desktops, (enlightenment and kde both are not uptodate, orcomplete)
and applications that seem cut back from previous versions. It just seems
like all I got was 6.1 with fixes. I had that before I
went to 6.2., I actually had more.
Sort of hard to explain.... I you read my original post, I was really just
curious about others' opinions of 6.2.
---
David S. Yates' Lotta Linux Links
http://dsyates.home.mindspring.com
>>> Lars Kellogg-Stedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/14 8:16 AM >>>
> Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2?
> I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that
I
> have been unhappy with.
> It sort of seems like a downgrade for me.
I felt the same way about 6.1.
You've made a very vague statement here, without any supporting evidence,
so it's somewhat difficult to determine why you feel this way.
6.2 -- which I am running on both Sparc and Intel systems -- has thus far
appeared to be quite stable. I found that the installer, in particular,
has been much improved over the bug-prone one used with 6.1.
What particular problems have you seen?
-- Lars
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --> http://www.larsshack.org/
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
