I aggree 150% . Nice to hear an independant soul on the list.
Steve Frampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, rpjday wrote:
>
> > arrrrggghh! because, as i recall, you asked for a "server" install, no?
>
> Er...
>
> > if something is going to be a server, that suggests it is going to be a
> > 24x7 box, never to be dual-booted. hence, the complete wiping of the
> > disks and everything on them.
>
> Huh? Why? I have a pretty nice Alpha box here, which has a RAID unit
> attached with about 24 Gb of user space. Until now, it has been an
> Digital Unix "Tru64" database server, but has been retired from that
> purpose.
>
> Had Vidiot not screamed loud and hard about the problems with the
> installation routine, Red Hat "Server" install would have not only wiped
> out Digital Unix on the system disk (good thing), but all 24 Gb of user
> data as well (BAAAAD thing).
>
> I agree 100% with Vidiot on this -- there should be an option to choose
> between "automatic" and "manual" partitioning.
>
> I find it amusing that so many Red Hat enthusiasts find the current way
> "the way it is" and that nothing can be improved upon.
>
ME TOO . No wonder Winbucks is selling so well .
> By the way, I'm a Red Hat apologist enthusiast myself (proof at
> http://www.LinuxNinja.com/linux-admin) but I'm able to recognize when a
> problem exists.
>
Yeap !
Philippe
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
