Jeff:
I just tried this on my machine:
/etc/rc.d/init.d: ./network restart
Shutting down interface eth0 [ OK ]
Shutting down interface eth1 [ OK ]
Disabling IPv4 packet forwarding [ OK ]
Enabling IPv4 packet forwarding [ OK ]
Bringing up interface lo [ OK ]
Bringing up interface eth0 [ OK ]
Bringing up interface eth1 [ OK ]
Then ifconfig shows this:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:DA:BD:88:60
inet addr:24.218.81.23 Bcast:24.218.83.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:18926 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:7778 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xec00
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:86 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:86 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
Notice still no eth1. By the way, I thought network was called when the
machine booted up? Like I mentioned, when I first boot the machine, all
three interfaces (eth0, eth1, and lo) show when I do an ifconfig. After a
short period, eth1 goes away, and I'd like to try and figure out why.
- Mike
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Jeff Graves wrote:
> Did you do a /etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart after bringing up
> interfaces?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael J. McGillick [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 1:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Ethernet Question - Take 2 :)
>
> Morning Everyone:
>
> I just recently did a reinstall of Red Hat 6.1. Before doing the
> install,
> I put two new Ethernet cards in the machine, a 3Com Etherlink
> 10/100 Mbps
> PCI (Model # 3c905C-TX-M) and a 3Com Fast Etherlink XL PCI (3C90x
> family).
> Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but my assumption was that these
> cards
> should use the 3c90x module. After the install finished, I
> looked in
> conf.modules and saw the following:
>
> alias eth0 3c59x
>
> Oddly enough, my connection for eth0 seemed to come up fine. I
> still
> didn't have anything for eth1, so I went into X and started up
> the
> control-panel and started up networking. It showed the second
> interface on my machine, but that it was disabled. I configured
> it
> with a static IP address of 192.168.1.1, and selected to have it
> come
> up at boot. I then enabled it, and sure enough, the interface
> showed in
> ifconfig.
>
> After rebooting, I watched the start-up process, and noticed that
> eth0 was
> initialized with no problem. However, with eth1, I got the error
> message
> about delaying initialization. Hmmm.
>
> I thought back to what others had said on this list, and
> remembered
> something about conf.modules and specifying which module to use
> for a
> particular card. Well, I changed the line in /etc/conf.modules
> to this:
>
> alias eth0 3c90x
> alias eth1 3c90x
>
> I rebooted the machine, and still got the same problem. I then
> further
> remembered about adding a line to lilo.conf for a machine that
> has two
> Ethernet cards. So, I added this line to lilo.conf:
>
> append="ether=10,0xec00,eth0 ether=15,0xdc00,eth1"
>
> This time when I rebooted, both cards initialized. Ok, I was
> getting
> closer. I ran an ifconfig when the machine first booted up, and
> say both
> Ethernet cards listed. I went off to check the configuration of
> some
> other stuff, and came back a few minutes later. When I ran
> ifconfig
> again, eth1 was no longer listed, and I seemed to have problems
> getting
> the interface to come back up again.
>
> Well, stumped at this point, I read the Ethernet-HOWTO. It
> mentioned
> about compiling the driver as part of the kernel, so I recompiled
> the
> kernel, and specified that the 3c90x driver be compiled with the
> kernel,
> and not be a module. I also made sure to remove the alias eth?
> entries
> from conf.modules.
>
> A subsequent boot revealed that both cards came up just fine. I
> ran an
> ifconfig, and both were listed there with no problems. I worked
> on my
> machine this morning for about 30 minutes before going to work,
> and when I
> checked, both interfaces still showed in ifconfig. I thought I
> had this
> problem solved.
>
> When I got to work, I did another ifconfig. In the listing, eth1
> is not
> listed as active. I'm stumped at this point. Can anyone tell me
> what
> might be going on here? I originally had two DaynaPORT PCI cards
> in the
> machine with the DEC Tulip chipset, and they just worked after
> the
> install. Maybe I got lucky, as I never had to do any of this
> before. I
> would really appreciate any help or ideas people have on this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Mike
>
> P.S.
>
> Did I do something incorrect here by changing what the installer
> detected
> my card as? Can both my Ethernet cards use the 3c59x setting
> without any
> performance loss on the cards?
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
