Looks to me like a config issue with eth1. Check the irq and i/o 
settings and make sure that they don't conflit with any other 
devices. Usually, if you have a sound card, they like to take the 
200-330 range so make the second card an i/o of 350 and irq of 
10. That's what i usually use. Otherwise, try a different module.

-----Original Message-----
From:   Michael J. McGillick [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, January 18, 2000 3:44 PM
To:     '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:        RE: Ethernet Question - Take 2 :)

Jeff:

A quick check in /var/log/messages reveals this right after I did 
the
network restart command you suggested:

Jan 18 15:24:30 universe pumpd[1734]: starting at Tue Jan 18 
15:24:30 2000
Jan 18 15:24:41 universe pumpd[1734]: configured interface eth0
Jan 18 15:24:41 universe ifup:  done.
Jan 18 15:24:41 universe network: Bringing up interface eth0 
succeeded
Jan 18 15:24:42 universe ifup: SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such device
Jan 18 15:24:42 universe ifup: SIOCADDRT: Network is down
Jan 18 15:24:42 universe network: Bringing up interface eth1 
succeeded

Does this point to anything?

- Mike

On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Jeff Graves wrote:

> Which card is eth1? I would suggest changing the module for 
that
> one. I remember you saying that it originally used 3c59x 
module.
> I would try loading that one for eth1 so if it helps. Also, 
check
> /var/log/messages to see if it has any relevant info.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael J. McGillick [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 3:27 PM
> To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:      RE: Ethernet Question - Take 2 :)
>
> Jeff:
>
> I just tried this on my machine:
>
> /etc/rc.d/init.d: ./network restart
> Shutting down interface eth0                               [ 
 OK
>  ]
> Shutting down interface eth1                               [ 
 OK
>  ]
> Disabling IPv4 packet forwarding                           [ 
 OK
>  ]
> Enabling IPv4 packet forwarding                            [ 
 OK
>  ]
> Bringing up interface lo                                   [ 
 OK
>  ]
> Bringing up interface eth0                                 [ 
 OK
>  ]
> Bringing up interface eth1                                 [ 
 OK
>  ]
>
> Then ifconfig shows this:
>
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:DA:BD:88:60
>           inet addr:24.218.81.23  Bcast:24.218.83.255
>  Mask:255.255.252.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:18926 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 
frame:0
>           TX packets:7778 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 
carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>           Interrupt:10 Base address:0xec00
>
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3924  Metric:1
>           RX packets:86 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:86 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>
> Notice still no eth1.  By the way, I thought network was called 
> when the
> machine booted up?  Like I mentioned, when I first boot the
> machine, all
> three interfaces (eth0, eth1, and lo) show when I do an 
ifconfig.
>  After a
> short period, eth1 goes away, and I'd like to try and figure 
out
> why.
>
> - Mike
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Jeff Graves wrote:
>
> > Did you do a /etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart after bringing 
up
> > interfaces?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Michael J. McGillick 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent:       Tuesday, January 18, 2000 1:26 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:    Ethernet Question - Take 2 :)
> >
> > Morning Everyone:
> >
> > I just recently did a reinstall of Red Hat 6.1.  Before doing 
> the
> > install,
> > I put two new Ethernet cards in the machine, a 3Com Etherlink
> > 10/100 Mbps
> > PCI (Model # 3c905C-TX-M) and a 3Com Fast Etherlink XL PCI
> (3C90x
> > family).
> > Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but my assumption was that 
these
> > cards
> > should use the 3c90x module.  After the install finished, I
> > looked in
> > conf.modules and saw the following:
> >
> >    alias eth0 3c59x
> >
> > Oddly enough, my connection for eth0 seemed to come up fine. 
 I
> > still
> > didn't have anything for eth1, so I went into X and started 
up
> > the
> > control-panel and started up networking.  It showed the 
second
> > interface on my machine, but that it was disabled.  I
> configured
> > it
> > with a static IP address of 192.168.1.1, and selected to have 
> it
> > come
> > up at boot.  I then enabled it, and sure enough, the 
interface
> > showed in
> > ifconfig.
> >
> > After rebooting, I watched the start-up process, and noticed
> that
> > eth0 was
> > initialized with no problem.  However, with eth1, I got the
> error
> > message
> > about delaying initialization.  Hmmm.
> >
> > I thought back to what others had said on this list, and
> > remembered
> > something about conf.modules and specifying which module to 
use
> > for a
> > particular card.  Well, I changed the line in 
/etc/conf.modules
> > to this:
> >
> >    alias eth0 3c90x
> >    alias eth1 3c90x
> >
> > I rebooted the machine, and still got the same problem.  I 
then
> > further
> > remembered about adding a line to lilo.conf for a machine 
that
> > has two
> > Ethernet cards.  So, I added this line to lilo.conf:
> >
> >    append="ether=10,0xec00,eth0 ether=15,0xdc00,eth1"
> >
> > This time when I rebooted, both cards initialized.  Ok, I was
> > getting
> > closer.  I ran an ifconfig when the machine first booted up,
> and
> > say both
> > Ethernet cards listed.  I went off to check the configuration 
> of
> > some
> > other stuff, and came back a few minutes later.  When I ran
> > ifconfig
> > again, eth1 was no longer listed, and I seemed to have 
problems
> > getting
> > the interface to come back up again.
> >
> > Well, stumped at this point, I read the Ethernet-HOWTO.  It
> > mentioned
> > about compiling the driver as part of the kernel, so I
> recompiled
> > the
> > kernel, and specified that the 3c90x driver be compiled with
> the
> > kernel,
> > and not be a module.  I also made sure to remove the alias 
eth?
> > entries
> > from conf.modules.
> >
> > A subsequent boot revealed that both cards came up just fine. 
>  I
> > ran an
> > ifconfig, and both were listed there with no problems.  I
> worked
> > on my
> > machine this morning for about 30 minutes before going to 
work,
> > and when I
> > checked, both interfaces still showed in ifconfig.  I thought 
I
> > had this
> > problem solved.
> >
> > When I got to work, I did another ifconfig.  In the listing,
> eth1
> > is not
> > listed as active.  I'm stumped at this point.  Can anyone 
tell
> me
> > what
> > might be going on here?  I originally had two DaynaPORT PCI
> cards
> > in the
> > machine with the DEC Tulip chipset, and they just worked 
after
> > the
> > install.  Maybe I got lucky, as I never had to do any of this
> > before.  I
> > would really appreciate any help or ideas people have on 
this.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > - Mike
> >
> > P.S.
> >
> > Did I do something incorrect here by changing what the
> installer
> > detected
> > my card as?  Can both my Ethernet cards use the 3c59x setting
> > without any
> > performance loss on the cards?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe"
> > as the Subject.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe"
> > as the Subject.
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
"unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsu  
bscribe"
as the Subject.


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to