On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> If you need rpms for 2.3, do you really think you should be using that
> kernel?
maybe it's not so much need, but want... i'm perfectly comforatble
comiling apps myself, but in most cases try for RPMs first.
things like netatalk i could really do without compiling. from when i was
using the 2.1 kernels, it was the same thing... i went through the list of
things and their versions, and got rpms for everything that was available.
then only did the source thing with the packages that didn't have RPM
versions
brian
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
