Actually, it's a good idea to have it in place so when 2.4 does release,
it'll be there. Plus, kernel testing is a plus as well... :)
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:05:50 -0600 (CST)
Jeff Smelser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you need rpms for 2.3, do you really think you should be using that
> kernel?
_________________________________________________________________________
Brian Wright Aturna Communications Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Services
WWW http://www.aturna.net
_________________________________________________________________________
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
