On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> "John D. Hardin" wrote:
> > > The network model does NAT itself, so it's basically a secure
> > > firewall/hub all by itself.
> > Bah.
>
> <Eric Cartman voice> That's what I said. </Eric Cartman voice>
>
> > <paranoia>
> > Don't trust it. Who knows what vendor support backdoor passwords are
> > on it? What if it doesn't properly implement NAT for a protocol you
> > want to use?
>
> Exactly, I'm looking for better modems. EllTell is offering those for
> $99. What do you use?
Me personally? I live where these fancy-schmancy broadband access
solutions aren't available yet. :(
However, the install I did for my company uses a Cisco DSL modem.
700-something series IIRC, which I probably don't.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin
768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Failure to plan ahead on someone else's part does not constitute an
emergency on my part.
- David W. Barts in a.s.r
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
38 days until the Y2K apocalypse - keep gold & ammo handy!
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.