Well, since we're talking about HTML email, I'm in the process of
modifying an email program I wrote to pull the text out of an HTML post
and discard the HTML portion. As such I need to see how different email
programs format HTML email. Could as many of you as possible email a note
to me (not the list!) at [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Please leave HTML in
the subject so Procmail files all these letters in the proper folder.
Thanks,
Glen
Glen Lee Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" for general perl questions
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Frank A. Baldevarona wrote:
>Thanks. That was very funny.
>
>Frank
>
>Marc Davis wrote:
>>
>> Juha Saarinen wrote:
>>
>> > > That is why a majority of e-mail lists BAN the use of HTML e-mail.
>> >
>> > The Red Hat list doesn't, AFAIK. A simple "please don't use HTML when
>> > sending to the list" would have been enough. Flaming newcomers to the
>> > list is counterproductive and represents behaviour that IMO should be
>> > banned from the list.
>> >
>>
>> <GRIN type = "sardonic">
>>
>> Gosh. Feels like I'm trapped on #linux. By my highly unofficial count,
>> in the last two days, we've discussed (or implied):
>>
>> - banning people who use cuss words
>> - banning people who complain about people who use cuss words
>> - people who use HTML email
>> - people who don't use HTML email and ask others to not do so
>> - people who flame newbies
>> - newbies who can't take being flamed
>> - people who don't stick to the list topic
>> - people whose sig files are too long
>> - people who ask questions about Microsoft products
>>
>> </GRIN>
>>
>> Personally I think we should ban people who comment on the general tenor
>> of
>> posts to this lis . . .
>> **BANNED**kicked from #redhat-list by g0d
>>
>> Smiles, everybody.
>> Marc
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
