<quote who="Rodolfo J. Paiz"> > At 11:00 9/18/2003 -0400, you wrote: >>Doesn't the fast fiber connection cost on a monthly basis? So you go >> from >>a fixed cost solution to a monthly cost. It might be cost effective to >>start but for how long will that remain true? > > Not always. You're assuming your market, your carriers, your conditions. A > friend of mine has a 10-mile WiFi link (yes, tunneled, no bitching!) that > cost him $300 to set up and $0 per month, and I'm dying to get a piece of > that...
I made no assumptions. I asked a question. Or does a question mark in your part of the world not denote a question? I didn't know. That's why I asked the question. Yes, fixed cost was the wrong terminology. I can't think of a simple term to denote a single large expense vs. a smaller single expense plus monthly expenses. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
