On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:40:11 -0700 "Chris W. Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AragonX <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:00 AM said: > > > Doesn't the fast fiber connection cost on a monthly basis? So you > > go > > from a fixed cost solution to a monthly cost. It might be cost > > effective to start but for how long will that remain true? > > Wait... Doesn't fixed cost mean it's the same each period, whatever > that > period is? > > I mean, "monthly cost" is the same as fixed cost because it's fixed? > It > doesn't change period to period (a period being one month in this > case). > > Do I have the wrong idea? > No, you're correct. I think the OP meant operational cost as opposed to installation cost. He made the assumption that it was an outsourced fiber link. If the fiber connection is on your own land between buildings for instance, there is no need for a monthly fee. Cheers, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
