On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 07:47, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Oops. Yes, slipped my mind for a sec ;-). Probably not a second > machine there so you could have setup mutual serial consoles.
Not at the moment, no. It's colo'd at an ISP, and if I need to ever work on it, it has to be disconnected and moved into a work room. During that time it's not plugged into the network, though. It may be doable, but not anytime soon. > So there's no need for pauses. The information should end up in dmesg. Right. There's no way to make it more verbose, though, right? I don't know if it would help, though. > That's double sad :-( . Had you made the same mistake on the > production box your problem would now have likely been solved. And > because the problem is not reproducible it's harder to debug even if > you file a bug report. Tell me about it. :\ It is reproducible, but only on the same machine. Therefore either something with the machine is uniquely screwed up. It's just a matter of what. :| -- Ricky Boone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Planetfurry.com -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
