On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:42, rm wrote: > none of us really knows if there is any truth to their claim.
Yes, and unless they disclose what their claim really is, then no one will really know. Signing a 'brutal NDA' to hear their claim is not disclosure. > David Boise is a damn good lawyer, Was not able to do much for Napster .... good and able to leap tall buildings are different. > Some interesting stuff here > http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/2003/07/News91.html Yes, and that piece starts out with a piece of FUD. The first part implies they have something from the Copyright Office that the piece implies validates their claim. The Copyright Office is, pure and simple, a registrar. It can provide evidence to the legal system of ownership. But the implied message that what SCO received validates their claim is pure FUD since the CO cannot provide anything more than registration information - who registered what and when. - rick -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
