On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 15:57, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > You mean like Webmin? Because if you're doing really simple stuff, then > it's all good. Anything more complex and more then likely the gui will > mess it up.
I've rarely ever had Webmin mess up any config files, even when doing something complex. And even when it does the developer(s) usually have a patch for it. No, you're not able to do everything you could by just going into the config files by hand, but it does help get a lot done without having to have every needed directive memorized, etc. > Better for them doesn't mean it's better for the config. It's just like > WYSIWYG, but instead of for HTML it's for a config file (which would > make any error that much worse). By hand it only takes up to 20 minutes > to set up httpd.conf and a basic vhost (seperate file(s), of course). You're right, it doesn't take too much time to set it up from scratch. On the same token, it probably wouldn't take much time to setup 90% of the systems and services available that way. Helpful tools have been designed to help, though. I'm just saying redhat-config-httpd should be developed further. Even if it were at the level that Webmin's Apache Module is at I'd be okay with it. -- Ricky Boone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Planetfurry.com -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
