On Tuesday 01 Apr 2003 12:58 am, David Busby wrote: > The real one: > http://uptime.netcraft.net/up/today/top.avg.html
The downer from that page is that there's not one Linux box listed but there is 1 Win2K > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ben Russo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 15:45 > Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows > > > Louis Sabet wrote: > > > Quite. The proof is in the pudding as they say... > > > Find me a windows box that'll do this: > > > 3:22pm up 306 days, 2:18, 0 users, load average: 0.05, 0.09, 0.08 > > > > > > This is an apache/mod_ssl machine running a ton of perl, and a bunch > > > of log analysis stuff. The day I see a publicly visible win32 box > > > running IIS with a similar uptime I'll eat my ascii. > > > > Get some salt and pepper: > > http://uptime.netcraft.net/up/hosted?netname=VRIO-198-106,198.106.0.0,198.1 >0 7.255.255 > > > ;-) These are probably artifacts of the netcraft monitoring, but maybe > > not? > > > > -Ben. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Gary Stainburn This email does not contain private or confidential material as it may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
