> That's the reason I didn't go with a 2200 DL; Toner prices were > over 70% higher. On the 2300DL, it looks like I can get Toner on > the web in the high capacity cartridges for $79US (black) and $109US > for the each of the three colored cartridges. The black has printed
See, now, my customers would be happy to pay those sorts of prices. At the moment 1 US is about 1.67 AUS.(http://www.xe.com/ucc/) So, at $132 and $183 these are the prices they USED to pay. I'm assuming the 2200 DL is fairly new then? My customers are using the MagicColor 2 and MagiColor 6600 (at least 4 years old probably more). Maybe Minolta-QMS don't want to support those old QMS printer any more and have hiked the toner prices to force upgrades? Pretty brain-dead idea. Who is going to buy one after being slogged up to $800 per toner? What's to say the prices are good now and they won't do it again? Sigh. You gotta wonder who comes up with these brilliant ideas at Minolta. Regards, --- Edward Dekkers (Director) Triple D Computer Services P/L -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
