On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Giulio Orsero wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 16:39:55 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > booting the new kernel failed, allegedly couldn't mount the > >root FS "LABEL=/", as if it wasn't capable of translating the fact > >that i was referring to /dev/hda1 by LABEL and not device name. > > > > i rebooted and, at the grub menu, just edited that line to say > >"root=/dev/hda1". no problem. > > Did you by any chance added a disk or partition, so that now there's more > than one partition with label = /? > Does "e2label /dev/hda1" show the expected label?
i've verified all of that, and i am still baffled. the only major difference is that the original 2.4.18-14 kernel has ext3 support as a module and uses an initrd.img file referenced from /etc grub.conf, while my new 2.4.20-2.2 kernel has ext3 support compiled into the kernel and no initrd line in grub.conf. i see no reason for that to make a difference. both kernel entries in grub.conf use the "root=LABEL=/" syntax. the earlier kernel boots fine, the newer kernel fails and requires me to edit the kernel line and substitute "root=/dev/hda1". still wondering what to try next to isolate this ... rday -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list