On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Giulio Orsero wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 16:39:55 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> >  booting the new kernel failed, allegedly couldn't mount the
> >root FS "LABEL=/", as if it wasn't capable of translating the fact
> >that i was referring to /dev/hda1 by LABEL and not device name.
> >
> >  i rebooted and, at the grub menu, just edited that line to say
> >"root=/dev/hda1".  no problem.
> 
> Did you by any chance added a disk or partition, so that now there's more
> than one partition with label = /?
> Does "e2label /dev/hda1" show the expected label?

i've verified all of that, and i am still baffled.  the only major
difference is that the original 2.4.18-14 kernel has ext3 support
as a module and uses an initrd.img file referenced from /etc grub.conf,
while my new 2.4.20-2.2 kernel has ext3 support compiled into the
kernel and no initrd line in grub.conf.

i see no reason for that to make a difference.  both kernel entries
in grub.conf use the "root=LABEL=/" syntax.  the earlier kernel boots
fine, the newer kernel fails and requires me to edit the kernel
line and substitute "root=/dev/hda1".

still wondering what to try next to isolate this ...

rday



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to