On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:54:30PM -0500, George Neuner wrote:
> 
> Is there a way to whitelist / trust posters.  One of the other groups I
> follow is moderated, but is set up so that messages from trusted posters go
> straight through.  The moderator(s) only have to look at posts coming from
> untrusted sources and decide whether new posters can be trusted.
> 
> Caveat: I don't know how much effort that requires.  It just seems like a
> possible 4th option (if doable).

This was done for the Babylon 5 usenet group a few dacades ago.
Of course, that wasn't a Google-provided mailin list.

-- hendrik

> 
> 
> On 12/14/2021 10:02 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> > 
> > > Wouldn't people asking to be invited be pretty much the same
> > moderation burden as option 3, but with less support? I guess that's a
> > way of saying I lean to option 3.
> > 
> > I see what you mean. I saw "invite-only" as the option with the most
> > /discretionary/ effort when volunteers are scarce, since a trusted
> > member of this community can add a member with a presumably lower risk
> > of introducing a spammer. Since I'm not going to be available to ban
> > spammers forever, I'm reading these options in terms of minimizing the
> > reasons someone has to drop what they are doing to mess with the list.
> > 
> > On 12/14/21 3:53 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> > > Sage Gerard<[email protected]>  writes:
> > > 
> > > > All,
> > > > 
> > > > I've gained administrative privileges over this list to address the 
> > > > spammer. I want to hear from others before I touch anything.
> > > > 
> > > Thanks for putting effort into this.
> > > 
> > > > I've been informed that an invite-only approach might not be 
> > > > appropriate, but without moderation, the only option I see is to change 
> > > > the privacy settings. Here are the choices Google gives us.
> > > > 
> > > > - Invited users only
> > > > - Anyone on the web can join
> > > > - Anyone on the web can ask
> > > Wouldn't people asking to be invited be pretty much the same moderation
> > > burden as option 3, but with less support? I guess that's a way of
> > > saying I lean to option 3.
> > > 
> > > > Comments welcome, but note that I do not know the chain of command. If
> > > > it comes down to my judgement, please let me know.
> > > > 
> > > Pretty sure I'm not in any relevant chain of command.
> > > 
> > > d
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/f22fdcd2-0781-4012-d906-cad44617ddc4%40comcast.net.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20211215183814.GA713%40topoi.pooq.com.

Reply via email to