Round 20 was recently published and Racket's score improved, as expected:
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r20&hw=ph&test=composite
We're now beating many of the popular frameworks in the composite scores
and I think there are still plenty of improvements that could be made.
hashim muqtadir writes:
> A new version of these benchmarks was just published ("Round 19"):
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r19
>
> Racket scores rather poorly (0 errors is nice, though). Anybody has any
> guesses as to why this is? Racket performs well enough as far as I'm
> concerned, and while I don't use the web server much, sounds unlikely that
> it should be so far below django, for example. Maybe they run it in a
> handicapped configuration or something.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/m2zh0cqm6d.fsf%40192.168.0.142.
