The reason for the poor performance relative to the other langs/frameworks is that there is currently no easy way to take advantage of multiple cores using the web framework so what’s being benchmarked is single core perf. This is mainly a problem for benchmarks such as this, but not really an issue in the real world where you’d just run multiple processes w/ a load balancer in front.
> On Jun 1, 2020, at 1:43 PM, hashim muqtadir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A new version of these benchmarks was just published ("Round 19"): > https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r19 > > Racket scores rather poorly (0 errors is nice, though). Anybody has any > guesses as to why this is? Racket performs well enough as far as I'm > concerned, and while I don't use the web server much, sounds unlikely that it > should be so far below django, for example. Maybe they run it in a > handicapped configuration or something. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/2a1062a4-e4f1-484c-a8a2-f63c161959e8%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/FD7C8C62-8AE2-411E-A32D-3AC180DFB3D6%40defn.io.
