On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 12:47:11PM -0800, unlimitedscolobb wrote:
> Thank you for you answer!  I'll need to think more about it.  The idea of 
> having structs whose fields contain functions has never occurred to me, but 
> it may actually fit my relatively simple use case (and the planned 
> migration to Typed Racket).

Historical note:

I first encountered structures containing function in the source code for
OS/360 way back in the late 60's.  In assembler.

-- hendrik

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20201108215826.sxdlxmult3teo6a3%40topoi.pooq.com.

Reply via email to