Hi, A general knowledge question: what would be the typical use cases of Racket generics vs. the typical use cases of Racket classes?
Am I correct in assuming that I can do everything with classes what I could do with generics, and that generics have made their way into the language before the classes? - Sergiu P.S. I'm reading the section on classes in the updated Typed Racket reference, and I'm very happy to see this new functionality! Very good job the Typed Racket Team! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/e992ac74-4aed-4b3f-a160-193bd7fb6026n%40googlegroups.com.
