On 7/2/2009 9:46 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:

<<- doesn't need to find z. It will replace it if found, or create a new one if not. (Personally I would have limited that to the first case, i.e. it should fail if it doesn't find z.)


Possibly. It's a holdover from S, where <<- assigns to the global environment unconditionally. (S doesn't have lexical scope, so there are effectively only two places to choose from: the function evaluation frame and the global frame -- unless you start mucking around with sys.frame, frame 0, frame 1, etc., in which case you'd use assign(...))

I didn't say we made the mistake ;-).

Duncan Murdoch

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to