On 2/07/2009, at 12:20 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
Is this expected behavior?
z <- 1:5
z[1] <<- 0
Error in z[1] <<- 0 : object "z" not found
The documentation seems to suggest that z will be found in the global
environment and modified accordingly.
I would agree that the documentation would *suggest* that, but it
doesn't explicitly say it, and no more it should, since the "[<<-"
operator does not exist. Unlike the "[<-" operator which does exist.
Moreover there is little reason for a "[<<-" operator to exist.
The basic raison-d'etre for the "<<-" operator is to allow one to
assign objects in the global environment from within a function.
But you shouldn't do it, even though it is possible!!!
Modifying a component of an existing object in the global environment
from within a function is even more to be avoided, it seems to me. And
the designers of R seem to have drawn the line at this point.
There may be conceptual difficulties with implementing a "[<<-"
operator,
over and above the philosophical position that using such an operator
would be bad practice. I don't know. But I doubt that R Core will move
to build a "[<<-" operator, even should it prove to be possible.
The error message ``object "z" not found'' is certainly misleading.
I don't
know how hard it would be to change the code so that a more enlightening
error message gets issued. Probably not worth the effort since few
users
would ever entertain the idea of using "[<<-".
cheers,
Rolf Turner
######################################################################
Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
