> On Nov 29, 2016, at 4:09 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> wrote: > > >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Hadley Wickham <had...@rstudio.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:52 AM, William Dunlap <wdun...@tibco.com> wrote: >>>> The other option would be to load dplyr first (which would give the waring >>>> that >stats::lag was masked) and then later load plm (which should give a >>>> further >warning that dplyr::lag is masked). Then the plm::lag function >>>> will >>>> be found >>>> first. >>> >>> Another option is to write the package maintainers and complain >>> that masking core functions is painful for users. >> >> Don't worry; many people have done that. > > Is it possible that the maintainer could add an explicit importation of the > lag function from pkg:stats?
Sorry. Meant to ask explicitly whether the plm maintainer could do that for plm users. Seems clear that dplyr is holding its ground. > > >> >> Hadley >> >> -- >> http://hadley.nz > > David Winsemius > Alameda, CA, USA > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
