> On Nov 29, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Hadley Wickham <had...@rstudio.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:52 AM, William Dunlap <wdun...@tibco.com> wrote: >>> The other option would be to load dplyr first (which would give the waring >>> that >stats::lag was masked) and then later load plm (which should give a >>> further >warning that dplyr::lag is masked). Then the plm::lag function will >>> be found >>> first. >> >> Another option is to write the package maintainers and complain >> that masking core functions is painful for users. > > Don't worry; many people have done that.
Is it possible that the maintainer could add an explicit importation of the lag function from pkg:stats? > > Hadley > > -- > http://hadley.nz David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
