On 03/03/15 16:08, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Sigh. To be positive is to be wrong at the top of one's lungs. Next I will be told R has a goto statement.
I am ***positive*** that it hasn't! :-) Well, 99.999% confident. Although I guess it's not inconceivable that some misguided nerd might construct one. In R all things are possible. It'd be tough, but, in view of the fact that "statements" are not identified/identifiable in R so it would be hard to tell the code, uh, where to go.
cheers, Rolf -- Rolf Turner Technical Editor ANZJS Department of Statistics University of Auckland Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276 Home phone: +64-9-480-4619 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
