Sigh. To be positive is to be wrong at the top of one's lungs. Next I will be
told R has a goto statement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live...
DCN:<jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On March 2, 2015 6:23:57 PM PST, Rolf Turner <r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
>On 03/03/15 15:04, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>> Your example is decidedly not expressed in R, though it looks like
>> you tried. Can you provide the hand-computed result that you are
>> trying to obtain?
>>
>> Note that the reason you cannot find anything about next or break in
>> R is that they don't exist.
>
>Point of order, Mr. Chairman, but they ***do*** exist. See e.g ?"next"
>
>(which actually takes you to the help for "Control Flow").
>
>> There are generally alternative ways to
>> accomplish the kinds of things you might want to accomplish without
>> them, and those alternatives often don't involve explicit loops at
>> all.
>
>Otherwise I concur with everything you say.
>
>cheers,
>
>Rolf
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
