Indeed both options are salable, though I agree the latter may be more convenient. Merci!
Patrick Burns wrote: > > As the answers you've received suggest, you > can use a list. Or you could have two > vectors: one with the data, the other with the > group identity. The latter format is likely more > convenient for a lot of analyses. > > Since your data are not inherently rectangular, > it is probably best to get the idea of spreadsheet > out of your head. (It is probably best anyway.) > > Patrick Burns > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +44 (0)20 8525 0696 > http://www.burns-stat.com > (home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User") > > T.D.Rudolph wrote: >> I have numerous objects, each containing continuous data representing the >> same variable, movement rate, yet each having a different number of rows. >> e.g. >> d1<-as.matrix(rnorm(5)) >> d2<-as.matrix(rnorm(3)) >> d3<-as.matrix(rnorm(6)) >> >> How can I merge these three columns side-by-side in order to create a >> table >> regardless of the difference in length? I wish to analyze the output in >> a >> spreadsheet format. >> >> Thanks! >> Tyler >> > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/merge-numerous-columns-of-unequal-length-tp17071464p17086657.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
