Peter,

You may have misunderstood me (I did not define correctly whose "internet
manners" I was referring to) — I was referring to the "internet manners" of
those seeking help, that, yes, they may not have adequately researched
things before asking a question, or may not have supplied a reproducible
example, etc., but they don't deserve to be treated disrespectfully — I
think we are agreeing on this…

Tom

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, peter dalgaard <pda...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:05 , Thomas Adams wrote:
>
> >
> > Nothing is gained by punishing people over their internet 'manners'∑
> >
> > Tom
>
> On the contrary, everything can be lost by allowing abusers to persevere!
>
> (And yes, there are people who no longer attempt to help, because of
> ungrateful and downright arrogant behavior they have experienced on the
> lists.)
>
> --
> Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
> Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
> Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
> Phone: (+45)38153501
> Email: pd....@cbs.dk  Priv: pda...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Thomas E Adams
National Weather Service
Ohio River Forecast Center
1901 South State Route 134
Wilmington, OH 45177

EMAIL:  thomas.ad...@noaa.gov
VOICE:  937-383-0528
FAX:    937-383-0033

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to