On Nov 07, 2011 at 9:04pm Mark Difford wrote: > So here the intercept represents the estimated counts...
Perhaps I should have added (though surely unnecessary in your case) that exponentiation gives the predicted/estimated counts, viz 21 (compared to 18 for the saturated model). ## > exp(3.044522) [1] 20.99999 Regards, Mark. ----- Mark Difford (Ph.D.) Research Associate Botany Department Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University Port Elizabeth, South Africa -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Estimate-of-intercept-in-loglinear-model-tp4009905p4012723.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
