On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Joshua Wiley wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Joshua Wiley
<jwiley.ps...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Eran,
You have already gotten some suggestions from Michael, but I think
that Rich is correct to question the rational.
I hope we should question the rationale, and doubt that Rich has
forsaken the rational.
Any mechanism you
choose to replace the missing values will impose its structure on the
data. Veritate ab absurdo:
or verum? who remembers their Latin declensions?
Veritas is third declension.
--
David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
