On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Joshua Wiley <jwiley.ps...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eran, > > You have already gotten some suggestions from Michael, but I think > that Rich is correct to question the rational. Any mechanism you > choose to replace the missing values will impose its structure on the > data. Veritate ab absurdo:
or verum? who remembers their Latin declensions? ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
