On 9 August 2018 at 20:37, Tomas Kalibera wrote: | So to answer your original question, this could probably be handled in | Rcpp,
Hm. Why do you say that / what did you have in mind? Recall that we do not alter SEXPs or introduce additional additional reference counters -- because we do not think that altering the basic R API for such calls would be a wise strategy. So we do more or less what is done in C for R, with some additional hand-holding which circumvents a number of common errors. | but in either case I would not use dyn.unload() in the first | place. This problem may be just one of many. I think I'd second that. I never had much unloading packages or dynamic libraries and tend to "just say no". Both short-lived processes (ie via 'r') as well as long sessions (ie R via ESS, running for weeks) work for my workflows. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
