>>>>> Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch>
>>>>> on Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:25:21 +0100 writes:
>>>>> John Chambers <j...@r-project.org>
>>>>> on Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:05:59 -0800 writes:
>> We do need an explicit method here, I think.
>> The issue is that as() uses methods for the generic function coerce()
but cannot use inheritance in the usual way (if it did, you would be
immediately back with no change, since "integer" inherits from "numeric").
>> Copying in the general method for coercing to "numeric" as an explicit
method for "integer" gives the expected result:
>>> setMethod("coerce", c("integer", "numeric"), getMethod("coerce",
c("ANY", "numeric")))
>> [1] "coerce"
>>> typeof(as(1L, "numeric"))
>> [1] "double"
>> Seems like a reasonable addition to the code, unless someone sees a
problem.
>> John
> I guess that that some package checks (in CRAN + Bioc + ... -
> land) will break,
> but I still think we should add such a coercion to R.
> Martin
Hmm... I've tried to add the above to R
and do notice that there are consequences that may be larger than
anticipated:
Here is example code:
myN <- setClass("myN", contains="numeric")
myNid <- setClass("myNid", contains="numeric",
representation(id="character"))
NN <- setClass("NN", representation(x="numeric"))
(m1 <- myN (1:3))
(m2 <- myNid(1:3, id = "i3"))
tools::assertError(NN (1:3))# in all R versions
## # current R | new R
## # -----------|----------
class(getDataPart(m1)) # integer | numeric
class(getDataPart(m2)) # integer | numeric
In other words, with the above setting, the traditional
gentleperson's agreement in S and R,
__ "numeric" sometimes conveniently means "integer" or "double" __
will be slightly less often used ... which of course may be a
very good thing.
However, it breaks strict back compatibility also in cases where
the previous behavior may have been preferable:
After all integer vectors need only have the space of doubles.
Shall we still go ahead and do apply this change to R-devel
and then all package others will be willing to update where necessary?
As this may affect the many hundreds of bioconductor packages
using S4 classes, I am -- exceptionally -- cross posting to the
bioc-devel list.
Martin Maechler
>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Benjamin Tyner <bty...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Perhaps it is not that surprising, given that
>>>
>>> > mode(1L)
>>> [1] "numeric"
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> > is.numeric(1L)
>>> [1] TRUE
>>>
>>> On the other hand, this is curious, to say the least:
>>>
>>> > is.double(as(1L, "double"))
>>> [1] FALSE
>>>
>>>> Here's the surprising behavior:
>>>>
>>>> x <- 1L
>>>> xx <- as(x, "numeric")
>>>> class(xx)
>>>> ## [1] "integer"
>>>>
>>>> It occurs because the call to `as(x, "numeric")` dispatches the coerce
>>>> S4 method for the signature `c("integer", "numeric")`, whose body is
>>>> copied in below.
>>>>
>>>> function (from, to = "numeric", strict = TRUE)
>>>> if (strict) {
>>>> class(from) <- "numeric"
>>>> from
>>>> } else from
>>>>
>>>> This in turn does nothing, even when strict=TRUE, because that
>>>> assignment to class "numeric" has no effect:
>>>>
>>>> x <- 10L
>>>> class(x) <- "numeric"
>>>> class(x)
>>>> [1] "integer"
>>>>
>>>> Is this the desired behavior for `as(x, "numeric")`?
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
