According to
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html#Reserved-words
if else repeat while function for in next break
TRUE FALSE NULL Inf NaN
NA NA_integer_ NA_real_ NA_complex_ NA_character_
... ..1 ..2 etc.
are all reserved keywords.
However, in R 3.0.2 you can do things like:
`if` <- function(cond, val1, val2) val2
after which
if(TRUE) 1 else 2
returns 2.
Similarly, users can change the implementation of `<-`, `(`, `{`, `||` and `&&`.
Two questions:
- Is this intended behaviour?
- If so, would it be a good idea to change the language definition
to prevent this? Doing so would both have the benefits that users
could count on keywords having their normal interpretation, and allow
R implementations to implement these more efficiently, including not
having to lookup the symbol each time. It'd break any code that
assumes that this is valid, but hopefully there's little or no code
that does.
Thanks
Karl
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
