On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 10:18 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Kasper, > > On 18 October 2012 at 10:41, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > | I set my user libraries in .Rprofile for this very reason. I agree it > | is weird that .Renviron is not always read etc. > > Sorry, no cigar either -- this equivalent to using files in $R_HOME/etc/ and > is also ignored by R CMD check, which still fails in my setup as it doesn't > find the package -- whereas any normal R session does. > > Dirk
I have R_LIBS set in my Bash profile (~/.bashrc) for IIRC this very reason. Can you do the same on Windows? G > > > | > | Kasper > | > | On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > | > > | > Keith, > | > > | > On 18 October 2012 at 09:14, Keith Jewell wrote: > | > | No reply in a number of hours, so here is a suggestion from ignorance > :-} > | > | > | > | ?Startup refers to a number of other "site and user files to process for > | > > | > Thanks, and I know, and use those on Linux (and on 'doze when I use it). > My > | > question was specifically about 'R CMD foo' which skips some of these by > | > choice, and which Rcmd_environ appears to overcome, albeit imcompletely. I > | > still have an issue on Windows where I cannot split my package > installations > | > between those that come and go with R installations, and the others. > | > > | > But it is truly bizarre that I can do (on Windows) > | > > | > R CMD INSTALL foo_1.2-3.tar.gz > | > > | > and a moment later > | > > | > R CMD check foo_1.2-3.tar.gz > | > > | > fails in its tests and examples with "no package called 'foo'" > | > > | > Doing 'R CMD check --no-examples --no-tests foo_1.2-3.tar.gz' works, but > is > | > less helpful as we're running the check to run those very tests... > | > > | > Dirk > | > > | > > | > | setting environment variables" but not to Rcmd_environ. The contents of > | > | $R_HOME/etc/Rcmd_environ seem to reflect (some of) the contents of > | > | (some) other files. > | > | > | > | I have similar lines (defining library paths) in > | > | $R_HOME/etc/Renviron.site > | > | > | > | Is it correct to directly edit Rcmd_environ or should it be modified > | > | only via other files? (A genuine question). > | > | > | > | On 17/10/2012 15:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | > > | > | > Is there a fundamental reason why I cannot set either one of > | > | > > | > | > ## add local library path -- doesn't work either > | > | > R_LIBS_USER="c:/opt/R-library" > | > | > R_LIBS_SITE="c:/opt/R-library" > | > | > > | > | > in $R_HOME/etc/Rcmd_environ even though I can seemingly set other > things here? > | > | > > | > | > It breaks "R CMD check" for me as I prefer NOT to install packages in > a > | > | > versioned path. > | > | > > | > | > FWIW, defaulting to a versioned path is (to this no-longer-bemused > user) as > | > | > much a permenent R bug (on Windoze) as the default installation into > a path > | > | > with spaces. > | > | > > | > | > Dirk > | > | > > | > | > | > | ______________________________________________ > | > | R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > | > | https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > | > > | > -- > | > Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com > | > > | > ______________________________________________ > | > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > | > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > -- %~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~% Dr. Gavin Simpson [t] +44 (0)20 7679 0522 ECRC, UCL Geography, [f] +44 (0)20 7679 0565 Pearson Building, [e] gavin.simpsonATNOSPAMucl.ac.uk Gower Street, London [w] http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfagls/ UK. WC1E 6BT. [w] http://www.freshwaters.org.uk %~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~% ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
