On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Spencer Graves <spencer.gra...@structuremonitoring.com> wrote: > Hi, Gabor, Paul, et al.: > > > For classes that did not supply a "ca" method, I'd rather see the > default being to start with the corresponding "c" method followed by an > effort to preserve attributes to the maximum extent feasible. I'm not sure > the best defaults, but at the moment, I would expect that attributes like > "dim" and "dimnames" should always be dropped. The current default "c" > method preserves "names" appropriately. > > > What do you think about including another argument to > "checkAttributes"? I'm not sure what the options should be nor what should > be the default, but one option should throw and error if any contradiction > was found while another would take all attributes from the first argument > and ignore others. > >
I think ca is easier to use. It would work consistently and simply across classes whereas fixing up c with checkAttribues is harder to use. ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
