On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Paul Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > I used to get caught by this c() behaviour often, but now I do expect it to > drop attributes. I think it would break many things if you change it, and > force people to write different code when they really do want to drop > attributes. When you want new behaviour it is usually better to define a new > function, ca() maybe? >
That would work if ca defaulted to c for those classes that did not supply a ca method. ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
