<ripley <at> stats.ox.ac.uk> writes: > Can you confirm you are running rl5.1? Given the segfault is readline not
Yes: readline 5.1, just like the bug submitter (see at the very bottom). > compatible version of a dynamic library so it seems to me the bug should > be assigned to readline not R. Looks like it, yes. And from looking at http://bugs.debian.org/libreadline5 it seems that the same behaviour was just found with gdb. Thanks for the quick replies! Dirk > > | ii libreadline-ru 1.8.3+1.8.4pre Readline interface for Ruby 1.8 > > | ii libreadline4 4.3-18 GNU readline and history libraries, run-time > > | un libreadline4-d <none> (no description available) > > | ii libreadline5 5.1-1 GNU readline and history libraries, run-time > > | ii libreadline5-d 5.1-1 GNU readline and history libraries, developm > > | ii r-base 2.2.1-1 GNU R statistical computing language and env > > | ii r-base-core 2.2.1-1 GNU R core of statistical computing language ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
