On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:48:25PM +0000, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > <ripley <at> stats.ox.ac.uk> writes: > > Can you confirm you are running rl5.1? Given the segfault is readline not > > Yes: readline 5.1, just like the bug submitter (see at the very bottom).
And a new Debian version libreadline5.1-3 (and now 5.1-4) fixes it. I assume the patch makes it upstream too. Dirk > > compatible version of a dynamic library so it seems to me the bug should > > be assigned to readline not R. > > Looks like it, yes. And from looking at http://bugs.debian.org/libreadline5 > it seems that the same behaviour was just found with gdb. > > Thanks for the quick replies! > > Dirk > > > > | ii libreadline-ru 1.8.3+1.8.4pre Readline interface for Ruby 1.8 > > > | ii libreadline4 4.3-18 GNU readline and history libraries, > run-time > > > | un libreadline4-d <none> (no description available) > > > | ii libreadline5 5.1-1 GNU readline and history libraries, > run-time > > > | ii libreadline5-d 5.1-1 GNU readline and history libraries, > developm > > > | ii r-base 2.2.1-1 GNU R statistical computing language > and env > > > | ii r-base-core 2.2.1-1 GNU R core of statistical computing > language > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. -- Thomas A. Edison ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
