Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote: <snipped> > I was more focused (and confused) on the Rgui.exe menus as the principal > justification for taking this approach, but again, perhaps I am lacking > context.
I think you are confused about Rgui.exe, versus "having a GUI for R" (which is what I wrote - I never wrote "Rgui.exe", as that was *not* what I meant all along). I did try but failed with the Sciview-R - it would install but won't run. Since the actual GUI faq is hosted by sciview on "http://www.sciviews.org/_rgui/"; as you pointed out, by association, my first guess was that it is a good bet to try the Sciview-R one first. If anybody can name a "better" GUI than sciview-R, windows or linux, I am all ears - "better" in any sense of the word, preferably not in the ESS sense, as I already have that - nothing obviously against it, but I like alternatives, preferably covering different usage areas. Before anybody jump in again, the fact that sciview-R is somewhat .NET framework dependent (at least the binary installed by the default installer seems to be) is justifiably a development issue? Hin-Tak Leung ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
