On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 21:15 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Note that we (well, primarily Peter Dalgaard) have considered > > > complete changes to the R-bugs "system" anyway some of which > > > would obliterate the e-mail interface completely IIRC. > > > > Bugzilla? ;-) > > > > JitterBug of course is no longer actively maintained by the Samba folks. > > X-actly. No need for the smiley. Apart from the maintenance issue, we > also have the problem of spam injection, aggravated by the fact that > Jitterbug is chopping headers off incoming mail, so that it looks like > it comes from us. We did get blackholed at one point - the entire > pubhealth department...
Ouch. That's not good. Perhaps that's one of many reasons that the Samba folks themselves have switched to Bugzilla? > It would be a no-brainer to switch to Bugzilla, were it not for the > 3000 or so messages that are already sitting in the Jitterbug > database. Might the python script linked at the follow Bugzilla report be of use? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124869 See the attachment in Comment #1: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=69233 as the author's web site link appears to be offline. I don't know python, so I would defer to others with more expertise as to whether the above is useful "as is", or might serve as a starting point. Marc ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
