On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 22:06 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 21:15 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > > > It would be a no-brainer to switch to Bugzilla, were it not for the > > > 3000 or so messages that are already sitting in the Jitterbug > > > database. > > > > Might the python script linked at the follow Bugzilla report be of use? > > > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124869 > > > > See the attachment in Comment #1: > > > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=69233 > > > > as the author's web site link appears to be offline. I don't know > > python, so I would defer to others with more expertise as to whether the > > above is useful "as is", or might serve as a starting point. > > Yes, I got the bright idea of googling for "jitterbug bugzilla" just > after replying as well... It does look quite useful. Not that I speak > Python either (Monty excepted), but the scheme he has been converting > from - status encoded in the directory name - is quite similar to our > slightly simpler Foo/Foo-fixed convention.
Well, hopefully that might work with only modest alteration then, enabling a less painful transition. Pending further review of course... Marc "Follow. But! Follow only if ye be men of valor, for the entrance to this cave is guarded by a creature so foul, so cruel that no man yet has fought with it and lived! Bones of full fifty men lie strewn about its lair. So, brave knights, if you do doubt your courage or your strength, come no further, for death awaits you all with nasty, big, pointy teeth." ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
