Yes, the application should always provide meaningful feedback to users. 
However, your comment is a bit harsh, as the search hits point to the Qt 
Creator Manual, which is delivered together with Qt Creator and can be 
considered a part of the application. 

So, instead of turning to your favorite internet search engine, you could also 
click the Help icon on the task bar to open the Help mode and browse or search 
for information in the Qt Creator Manual.

Leena

-----Original Message-----
From: qt-creator-bounces+riitta-leena.miettinen=nokia....@qt-project.org 
[mailto:qt-creator-bounces+riitta-leena.miettinen=nokia....@qt-project.org] On 
Behalf Of ext Peter Kuemmel
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:09 AM
Cc: qt-creator@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] Some thoughts about 2.5

> 
> I had the impression you did encounter a problem. Checking with the 
> usual suspects (Documentation(!), Google, #qt-creator on FreeNode, or 
> even here on the mailing list) _before_ jumping to generalizing 
> conclusions would have made sense.


But a good "Ansatz" which Geronimo points to is that qt-creator should inform 
the user in a way so he doesn't have go to Google&Co to solve or indentify a 
problem.

Peter

--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis 
zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
_______________________________________________
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
_______________________________________________
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator

Reply via email to