On Dienstag 29 Mai 2012, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Geronimo Ma. Hernandez > <geronimo...@gmx.com > > > wrote: > > > > But after all, netbeans, eclipse and even kdevelop have some nice > > features. And if those features make live easier, why not go for it? > > Serious answer: > > It depends on the feature. Eclipse, in particular, is what results when > people are encouraged to add features without constraint.
Agree! Debian is the opposite. It has a strong quality service and a project leader, that looks for quality, therefor it is not just the best linux, its also a base for lots of variants. I only like eclipse as an java ide. The rest ... ... let's change to talk about more pleasing things. > I can't speak for myself, but one of the reasons that *I* am using > QtCreator is that it is light-weight ... That was my first impression aside the very attractive look: whow, its really fast. And even more: most things you need are there, where you look for it. That's that much of intuitive, that I don't understand André's position respect to debugger support - or better said: the reaction of an unsupported debugger version. May be my "poor" sounded respectless, where it never was that intention. At that point, I was talking as user, not as developer. Talking about consistency: a little version check together with a nice popup: "your debugger version is unsupported. Please upgrade debugger to version xyz" would match the high quality of the rest of QtCreator. > But not at the cost of bloat or inconsistency. Fully agree! kind regards Gero _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
