On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Geronimo Ma. Hernandez <geronimo...@gmx.com > wrote:
> But after all, netbeans, eclipse and even kdevelop have some nice features. > And if those features make live easier, why not go for it? Serious answer: It depends on the feature. Eclipse, in particular, is what results when people are encouraged to add features without constraint. You get something very bloated, not very coherent (tools are inconsistent across languages where they should not be), difficult to maintain in a production development environment, and requiring large-memory machines to run with any sort of decent speed. I can't speak for myself, but one of the reasons that *I* am using QtCreator is that it is light-weight and multi-platform. There are aspects of QtCreator that I think could be significantly improved for multi-platform *target* development, and I have a serious love-hate relationship with CMake, but within those limits it is a very powerful and useful tool. So: new features? Sure! But not at the cost of bloat or inconsistency. Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
