On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 04:03:09PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 03:34:52PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 07:39:06PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
> > wrote:
> > > diff --git a/migration/qemu-file.c b/migration/qemu-file.c
> > > index 74f919de67..e206b05550 100644
> > > --- a/migration/qemu-file.c
> > > +++ b/migration/qemu-file.c
> > > @@ -377,8 +377,22 @@ static ssize_t qemu_fill_buffer(QEMUFile *f)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - len = f->ops->get_buffer(f->ioc, f->buf + pending,
> > > f->total_transferred,
> > > - IO_BUF_SIZE - pending, &local_error);
> > > + do {
> > > + len = qio_channel_read(f->ioc,
> > > + (char *)f->buf + pending,
> > > + IO_BUF_SIZE - pending,
> > > + &local_error);
> > > + if (len == QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK) {
> > > + if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
> > > + qio_channel_yield(f->ioc, G_IO_IN);
> > > + } else {
> > > + qio_channel_wait(f->ioc, G_IO_IN);
> > > + }
> > > + } else if (len < 0) {
> > > + len = EIO;
> >
> > This should be -EIO.
> >
> > > + }
> > > + } while (len == QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK);
> >
> > It's failing only with the new TLS test I added for postcopy somehow (at
> > least /x86_64/migration/postcopy/recovery/tls).. I also verified after the
> > change it'll work again.
>
> Assuming you can still reproduce the pre-existing flaw, can you capture
> a stack trace when it hangs. I'm wondering if it is a sign that the
> migration is not converging when using TLS under certain load conditions,
> because the test waits forever for converge.
Yes it is, and it reproduces here every time. It hangs at:
if (!got_stop) {
qtest_qmp_eventwait(from, "STOP");
}
>
> Also what scenario are you running in ? Bare metal or a VM, and what
> host arch ? Wondering if the machine is at all slow, or for example
> missing AES hardware acceleration or some such thing.
It's Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz, 40 cores.
It'll pass after I modify the downtime:
migrate_set_parameter_int(from, "downtime-limit", 100000);
And with QTEST_LOG=1 I found that the bw is indeed low, ~700mbps.
--
Peter Xu
