On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:38 PM Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> wrote:

> Markus Armbruster (12):
>   qapi: Simplify QAPISchemaIfCond's interface for generating C
>   qapi: Simplify how QAPISchemaIfCond represents "no condition"
>   tests/qapi-schema: Correct two 'if' conditionals
>   tests/qapi-schema: Demonstrate broken C code for 'if'
>   qapi: Fix C code generation for 'if'
>   qapi: Factor common recursion out of cgen_ifcond(), docgen_ifcond()
>   qapi: Avoid redundant parens in code generated for conditionals
>   qapi: Use "not COND" instead of "!COND" for generated documentation
>   qapi: Use re.fullmatch() where appropriate
>   tests/qapi-schema: Hide OrderedDict in test output
>   qapi: Tweak error messages for missing / conflicting meta-type
>   qapi: Tweak error messages for unknown / conflicting 'if' keys
>
>  scripts/qapi/common.py                  | 51 ++++++++++++++-----------
>  scripts/qapi/expr.py                    | 32 +++++++---------
>  scripts/qapi/gen.py                     |  6 +--
>  scripts/qapi/introspect.py              |  6 +--
>  scripts/qapi/schema.py                  | 12 +++++-
>  scripts/qapi/types.py                   | 22 +++++------
>  scripts/qapi/visit.py                   | 14 +++----
>  tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-key.err        |  2 +-
>  tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-keys.err       |  2 +-
>  tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json         |  2 +-
>  tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.out          |  6 +--
>  tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.txt          |  8 ++--
>  tests/qapi-schema/double-type.err       |  4 +-
>  tests/qapi-schema/enum-if-invalid.err   |  2 +-
>  tests/qapi-schema/missing-type.err      |  2 +-
>  tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json |  9 +++--
>  tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out  | 31 ++++++++-------
>  tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py          | 11 +++++-
>  18 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
>
The first patch, you should apply isort (we should have a check for that
and linters I suppose).

Series:
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <[email protected]>

-- 
> 2.31.1
>
>

Reply via email to