On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:29:46 +0100 Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:17:02 +0100 > Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On 05.12.2018 15:51, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > vfio-ap devices do not pin any pages in the host. Therefore, they > > > are belived to be compatible with memory ballooning. > > > > > > Flag them as compatible, so both vfio-ap and a balloon can be > > > used simultaneously. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> With the comment stuff sorted out: Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> @Connie: Just had a look at the MAINTAINERS file and hw/vfio/ap.c is listed under Arch. support S90 with you as a maintainer, and under vfio-ap with 4 maintainers listed one of them being me. The question is who is going to post a PULL request for this? > > > > Does it make sense to add cc stable for 3.1? > > Can do that, given that s390x systems really rely on the ballooner in > general. > I agree with cc stable. Halil
