On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:32:14 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 07.12.2018 13:29, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:17:02 +0100 > > Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> On 05.12.2018 15:51, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >>> vfio-ap devices do not pin any pages in the host. Therefore, they > >>> are belived to be compatible with memory ballooning. > >>> > >>> Flag them as compatible, so both vfio-ap and a balloon can be > >>> used simultaneously. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> > >> > >> Does it make sense to add cc stable for 3.1? > > > > Can do that, given that s390x systems really rely on the ballooner in > > general. > > Well, not relying is the wrong word. It is just strange that things like > > <memory unit='GiB'>2</memory> > <currentMemory unit='GiB'>1</currentMemory> > > do work > but suddenly no longer work when an AP device is added. > Let me rephrase that: Current setups rely on the functionality, and we don't want to break them by adding ap :)
